Showing posts with label dorothy malone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dorothy malone. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2014

The Fast and the Furious - 1955

"The Fast and the Furious" - 1955
Dir. by John Ireland and Edward Sampson - 1 hr. 13 min.

Full Movie

by Clayton Hollifield

There is literally no reason to watch "The Fast and the Furious."  Not even if you really liked the current Vin Diesel series of films.  Not even if you like fast cars, not if you think that a short movie will be easy to get through, no reason whatsoever.  You might suspect that it might be a lark, since you've seen all six F&F movies already over and over again, that you should watch the old film that the title originated from.  Don't do it.  Watching a car broken down on the side of the highway would be more entertaining.  A nice nap would do you some good.  Have you talked to your mother lately?  I bet she'd appreciate a phone call.

In a diner somewhere in SoCal, Connie (Dorothy Malone) pulls up in her Jaguar, and some fat dude named Faber (Bruce Carlisle) wants to help her with something, but she's not interested.  The talk of the diner is a murderer on the flee, a man who drove a truck driver off the road and to his mortal end.  As it so happens, Frank Webster (John Ireland) is dining, gets itchy when they start talking about him, bops Faber in the head, and kidnaps Connie.  They take off in her car, and they get really mad at each other until she gets Stockholm Syndrome, and he falls for her as well.  In the meantime, we discover that Connie is a race-car driver (hence the Jag), and that the race she was supposed to enter has decided to ban all women drivers, because of the dangerousness of the course.  But since the race ends in Mexico, coincidentally exactly where Frank is trying to get to, he ends up entering the race under an assumed identity.

If you're a fan of movies where the woman runs hot and cold until she finally gives into to her womanly desires (in this case, her desires apparently include being kidnapped and tied to stuff, and not being allowed to race because ovaries (even though the cars never even go that fast, and even if they did, the course is lined with hay bales, which we all know is state-of-the-art safety equipment)), still don't see "The Fast and the Furious."  There are like five actual characters in the movie, so the vast majority of the film is devoted to Frank and Connie, and there's no spark whatsoever between them.  It's not impossible to get away with making a movie that's not based on much more than the sexual tension between two people (I just watched "The Thomas Crown Affair," for crying out loud), or the appeal of some awesome cars.  But the stars had better be crackling with energy and attraction, and Ireland and Malone are no Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway.

Similarly, if you were hoping that the cars would be awesome, and that there might be some nifty driving sequences, refer to my recommendation in the first paragraph of this review.  There's an antique race (which does have some cool looking super-old cars), but the main race is conducted with what appear to be roadsters.  That's fine, but there's nothing that outstanding about the vehicles, certainly nothing iconic.  On top of that, parts of the race are filmed on a soundstage, with footage of the other cars projected onto a screen behind the actual car.  And the one thing that could have been cool, a wreck at the end of the film, is actually a shot of a toy car on a model set, and then a cut back to the real car gently resting against a tree.

I don't expect awesomeness out of a Roger Corman movie, there's only so far that you can stretch no budget and a ten day shoot (according to Wikipedia).  But if you're stuck with no budget and poor technical abilities, you either need to go the full Ed Wood or get really clever.  Neither of those things happened.  And honestly, if Universal Studios hadn't bought the name to this film to use on a new series of car movies (and it is admittedly a pretty awesome title), probably no one would even be mildly curious about this film.  It would have been rightfully forgotten, existing only as proof that if you are determined enough, you don't need talent, budget, or ideas to cobble together a feature length film.  And that's a positive message for most.  Instead, the new batch of movies have shined a light on a dark, best-forgotten corner of film history, revealing something that doesn't hold up.

.5 / 5 - TV

Sunday, October 27, 2013

The Big Sleep - 1946

"The Big Sleep" - 1946
Dir. by Howard Hawks - 1 hr. 54 min.

Trailer

by Clayton Hollifield

Part of what makes the best Humphrey Bogart movies the best Humphrey Bogart movies is a distinct sense of setting; San Francisco in "The Maltese Falcon," the collection of displaced expatriates biding time in Rick's Cafe in "Casablanca," the hard-scrabble Mexican mining camp in "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre."  The best of his movies couldn't have taken place anywhere other than exactly where they did, and Los Angeles is very much a relevant backdrop for "The Big Sleep."  Although there isn't much scenery shown, it's always looming just outside a window, and exerting it's influence on the characters living there.  The other thing that the best films have in common is a sense of inevitability; once you see how things are set up, there's really only one place Bogart and whomever is unfortunate enough to get tangled up with him can possibly end up.  It's kind of fun to watch the characters kick and scream and claw against their fate, but even they have an awareness of the road they're on.  In "The Big Sleep," once Bogey and Bacall size each other up for the first time on-screen, you know that the mystery isn't going to be the important part of the story.

Philip Marlowe (Humphrey Bogart) is hired for a case by a reclusive, sickly man named General Sternwood (Charles Waldron).  Marlowe's been hired to clean up a mess caused by one of his daughters, the wild and flirty Carmen (Martha Vickers), but the other daughter, Vivian (Lauren Bacall) thinks there's an ulterior motive.  Upon his investigation, Marlowe stumbles upon the body of a blackmailer, and a drugged Carmen as his only company.  Marlowe attempts to get Carmen clear, thinking that she couldn't have been responsible for Geiger's death, but every step he takes entangles matters further and further, and more bodies pile up.

Seeing as how I consider this a flawless victory of a film, there's not much to criticize.  Sure, you could bemoan the fact that the mystery aspect of "The Big Sleep" doesn't end up making much sense, but you'd also probably be the kind of person who complains about not knowing how the bowling tournament ends up in "The Big Lebowski."  The film isn't really about solving the initial crime, other than it compels the characters to movement.  For me, it was enough to know that things were very tangled, and that pretty much no one is clean, and that I should probably just not worry about that and instead focus on the ambiance and the budding romance between Marlowe and Vivian.  All of the crime stuff really just exists to either force them apart or push them together at various intervals, and that's just fine by me.

I wouldn't advance the notion that Lauren Bacall wasn't particularly good in this film, either.  The truth of the matter is that she was good enough in her scenes with Bogart (their off-screen chemistry surely helped) that I had no problem with her.  I'm not sure that another actress could have simmered and bantered back and forth with Bogart as convincingly (I love the scene where Vivian calls the police, and then she and Marlowe start playing dumb with the police back and forth - it's like capturing and condensing the best first date ever into a few minutes of screen time), and since that's what really sells "The Big Sleep" as an all-time great film, any criticism is unimportant.  Having seen a number of Bogart's films, Bacall is the one great romantic foil for him (and I mean successful one, there are plenty of tragic ones, but that's not "The Big Sleep"), and that should count for something.  And it's not as if there's just one great scene between the two of them, there are a handful, and there's also the single greatest line reading of telling someone you're in love with them ever, with Vivian slumped down in her car seat, resigning herself to the fact that she's spent some effort trying to deny.

So with the Bacall stuff out of the way, it's also probably good to point out that Bogart is fantastic in this movie.  This was a Hays Code-era film, so the fact that he rolls around town like a panty-dropper supreme is mostly implied (although the look that bookstore clerk gives him should have been accompanied by an audible "sploosh" and the sound of Marlowe's pants being ripped off telepathically), but his trademark rakishness isn't dulled much.  Bogart's stock character is usually pretty prickly, even moreso when he likes someone, and Marlowe supplies no shortage of great lines to that service.  He's reminded repeatedly that he "takes chances," which must be the 1940's way of telling him to fornicate himself, and it must be said that he usually has earned such a rejoinder.  But beyond Bogart's acting, pretty much everyone is good here, particularly Martha Vickers, who's frequently intoxicated and always playing the coquette, and who's character has boiled the world down to being either cute or not cute.

"The Big Sleep" is one of those movies that's elements might seem fairly standard, but they come together in a way that feels very authentic and fun.  Not everyone get involved in a complicated murder plot (that's the fantasy element), but most people know what it's like to fall in love with someone.  The fact that it happens in an unlikely setting somehow makes it seem more real than in many romance movies, where the romance is the full focus of the plot.  The fact that it's Bogey and Bacall elevates it, partly because it was real, partly because Bogey's so antagonistic that you can feel the pull when he starts including Bacall in his games instead of aiming them at her.  The result is one of the top tier of films that Bogart appeared in, maybe not the absolute finest, but in the top handful for certain, and always an absolute delight to watch.

5 / 5 - TV (HD)