Dir. by Joss Whedon - 2 hrs. 21 min.
by Clayton Hollifield
Well, I think my streak of seeing Marvel movies is just about over. No, not because of "Avengers: Age of Ultron," it was just fine. Instead, I saw trailers for both "Ant-Man" and the "Fantastic Four" reboot, and I'm pretty sure I'll be giving one of those a big ol' pass. FF, in particular, looks brutal. But we're not here to talk about those films, we're here to talk about the official sequel to one of the biggest-grossing, most-beloved action films in recent years. And it was pretty good. I didn't like it as much as the first, or even as much as the first "Iron Man" and "Thor" films, but I did like it. I think, once some time has passed, and another Avengers film comes along, that this will come off better, and as part of a longer story being told. Right now, it's much like the second "Star Wars" film, in that it's the "bummer" film, and until another movie in the series comes out, it's the final word on the story.
The Avengers start off avenging, crashing Baron Strucker's (Thomas Kretchmann) party and liberating Loki's wand-thingy from the grips of evil-doers. Tony Stark (
So, I wasn't kidding when I said this was the "bummer" film in the series. Part of that is that the events in the first Avengers film have had lasting effects (Iron Man, in particular, has had difficulty in processing all of it), but part of it that one of the opponents they have to deal with, the Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen), has the power of killing positive vibes and forcing people to wade through their own personal nightmares. This leads to one of the best action sequences, the thing that should have been built around in it's own film, putting fright and fury into the Hulk, which results in even more of the carnage that Dr. Banner has been trying to avoid and atone for. The message of the film is very much that people are often their own worst enemies (and that everything is better when you're part of a team, if you can manage to keep that team on the same page), and messages have to be felt and understood, not just explained to people. That means that everyone on the team will have to suffer in their own heads (which also leaves open the door for some stellar character development, where you kind of start to understand what it is exactly that motivates each character). These scenes aren't easy viewing, but they are good filmmaking.
Big action films need a couple of things. Big action pieces (check.) Big stakes (check). Bringing back as much of the cast as humanly possible (check - the only people that were really missing was Pepper Potts and Natalie Portman's character, and they were both discussed within the plot, so I don't think we're to assume that Ms. Portman and Ms. Paltrow have been written out of the series). Once you get past that stuff, it helps if you can sympathize with the characters, even if they're on opposite sides (check). And maybe if there wasn't another Avengers film, I would have liked this one better. The big issue was that the first Avengers film felt epic (and not in a internetty way, in a Homeric way). The action sequence at the end of that one was exhilarating and exhausting in a completely satisfying way, and hit upon something that I rarely see in films (how fighting for something, even something worthwhile, can wear you down to your very soul, and leave marks that can't be seen). Even though the stakes in "Age of Ultron" were large, it never felt epic in the same way. It was a giant battle, but felt on an individual scale. And the result never really felt like it was in doubt.
From where I'm sitting, "Avengers: Age of Ultron" felt more like another one of Marvel's admittedly pretty damned good string of solo character films that like another event film, like the first "Avengers." That means it was still good, all the things that you would have enjoyed about the other combination of characters are still there (like the character interactions and fast-paced dialogue), and it didn't break the string of enjoyable Avengers-related films. But things might look different five years from now, if there's a third Avengers film and more story with these characters. I leave open the possibility that "Ultron" will feel more like an important, but down chapter in the longer story when the whole deal is wrapped up. I do not leave open the possibility that the new "Fantastic Four" film is going to be any good whatsoever, though. That's straight doo-doo.
3.5 / 5 - Theatre (3D)