Showing posts with label ben kingsley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ben kingsley. Show all posts

Monday, May 20, 2013

Iron Man 3 - 2013

"Iron Man 3" - 2013
Dir. by Shane Black - 2 hrs. 10 min.

Official UK Trailer

by Clayton Hollifield

There is a beauty to seeing a sequel to an action movie or a super-hero movie: you don't have to waste time establishing characters.  By a third installment in a franchise, either people are on-board, or they've seen enough from the trailers for the previous films to have a ballpark idea of what the characters are like (or you can figure it out in context, of course, if you're willing to miss a couple of continuity-related jokes here and there).  So, instead of screwing around for the first third of a film trying desperately to blend character development with things going ka-boom without sacrificing either too badly.  "Iron Man 3" does this beautifully, jumping straight into the action.  It's also probably the difference between this film being a shade over two hours and it pushing two forty-five.

In Greek mythology, a nemesis is a vengeful spirit that exists to payback hubris.  It's an enemy that one creates from their own actions, and in the months following what happened in New York (which you can see for yourself in a little art-house documentary film called "The Avengers"), Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) begins to reap what he's sown roughly fifteen years in the past.  Stark was badly shaken by New York, and has thrown himself deeply into his work refining the Iron Man costume in order to withdraw from the world.  A series of unusual terrorist bombings, claimed by a "teacher" called The Mandarin (Ben Kingsley) riles Stark, who issues a personal challenge for The Mandarin to show up at his doorstep.  That goes about as well as you think it would.

Even though this third installment is helmed by a new director (Shane Black, taking over for Jon Favreau), the tone and visual approach isn't radically changed.  Like the first two films, there's a lot of spectacular action, things move along at a very brisk pace, and Downey Jr. motormouths his way through the entire thing.  One of the main differences is that the Iron Man armor almost takes on a second persona separate from Stark; he's in-costume for what feels like a lot less time this time around.  It's not a problem like in other super-hero movies (the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man series, where he's got a secret identity but keeps taking his mask off anyways), Stark is a public figure and has claimed Iron Man as his own.  Instead, it adds a layer to Stark's withdrawal from everything and everyone around him.  Since the armor doesn't provide anonymity (there's a scene where he leaves it parked outside of a restaurant like you'd park a car), there's much less appeal to Stark to being in it.  He'd rather tinker in his lab than engage the world around him.

The mystery of the film (no spoilers, because the plot twists are at least half of the fun here) is one that breaks down over several stages, and culminates in a huge, destructive fight scene that can only take place on the wharf, where there's all kinds of cool, inanimate things that can be wrecked without having to worry about loss of human life (at least on the scale of what happened in "The Avengers").  The villains are people who have been able to regenerate limbs, but it leaves them with the ability to hurl fire and heat up their bodies to explosive levels.  It's a side-effect of the Exogenesis process, which still has a few kinks that need to be worked out before it's ready and available at your local health food store.  But the people who have undergone the process are equal to Iron Man when it comes to combat, which makes for some fun fights.

In terms of the large action pieces, they're completely up to snuff.  The two largest are probably a sequence involving Iron Man saving people who are in free-fall, and the large end fight at the wharf.  I found myself unexpectedly on the edge of my seat for the former, and while the latter has a sense of inevitability (c'mon, it's the end boss battle.  You kinda know how that's got to end), it's a sustained piece of really good action.  The initial attack on Stark's home is pretty good, as well.  And all through it, there are little details to humanize Stark: it's clear his current armor is still in beta testing.  So on the action front, "Iron Man 3" delivers the goods.

Probably the thing that makes "Iron Man 3" most interesting is Stark's character arc; it becomes clear over the course of the movie that Tony Stark is the super-hero, not Iron Man.  Stark isn't amazing because he's got a cool suit of armor that allows him to do super-human things, the armor is an expression of Stark's brilliance.  The events in previous films has shaken his belief in himself, but he's able to understand here that he's the main attraction, that Stark's got the goods even if he's completely unarmed and you let him lose in a Home Depot with a charge card.  His resourcefulness comes back to the forefront like it did in the first "Iron Man" film, and it's a lot of fun to watch the character rediscover exactly what it is that makes him different from other people.

There's almost no way I could imagine someone who enjoyed any of the previous Iron Man appearances not really enjoying "Iron Man 3."  It works even if you haven't seen those movies, the mystery to the story is a very windy road that unfolds in a fun manner, and the villains are formidable.  So far, Marvel's done a great job with every single one of the Avengers string of films, and "Iron Man 3" continues that streak.  Also worth noting, Gwyneth Paltrow totally puts in her time at the gym.

4 / 5 - Theatre 3D

Monday, May 21, 2012

The Dictator - 2012

"The Dictator" - 2012
Dir. by Larry Charles - 1 hr. 23 min.

Official Trailer

by Clayton Hollifield

"The Dictator" is closer to "Ali G Indahouse" than it is to "Borat."  That's not to say that it's not funny, but it's something to keep in mind if you're debating whether or not to see "The Dictator."  This is not an extended prank movie with real reactions, it's a scripted comedy.  Sacha Baron Cohen is good at those, too, but without the natural reactions of non-actors, some of the comedy lacks a punch.

Cohen plays Admiral General Haffaz Aladeen, a brutal dictator in the fictional African country of Wadiya.  When he comes to the United States to address the U.N., he is ousted from power and replaced with a imbecilic double.  Of course, this doesn't sit well with him, and with the help of Zoey (Anna Faris), he tries to adapt to life in America (while secretly plotting to get his dictatorship back).  If that sounds like a thin plot, you'd partially be right.  It's a very short film, and the plot isn't really the point.  It's a reason to move Aladeen from situation to situation, and is sufficient for that cause.

I guess the first thing to address is the hand-wringing over whether or not a viewer should be offended by this film.  There are a number of reasons why you might be (or feel like you ought to be), but Cohen's made enough films that what you'd see in "The Dictator" shouldn't come as a surprise (or at least the level of the humor, there is certainly shock value here).  But also, Cohen is a very aggressive comedian.  Rather than taking the role of underdog, he tends to play delusional characters that behave badly because they don't know any better.  A lot of the fun that comes from watching Cohen act is in his aggressively bad behavior; when he gets excited hearing about a "rape center," Aladeen doesn't exactly wink when suggesting that he and Zoey make a night of visiting there).  So, rather than condemning Cohen for his comedic approach, I'd acknowledge that it's not for everyone, and suggest that if you're taken aback by anything in "The Dictator," for heaven's sake please never watch "Bruno."

And for a couple of reasons, "The Dictator" falls short of both "Borat" and "Bruno."  For one thing, it's just not quite as funny.  There are scenes here that are good, and Aladeen's pointed speech at the end of the film explaining how America behaves like a dictatorship (in so many words) is excellent.  At the same time, just like the scene towards the end of "Bruno" involving two mixed martial artists stopping their match to make out in the cage in a southern town, the people who probably should understand the message are going to be put off by the method of delivery.  The deliberately confrontational approach is a valid one, and Cohen is determined to mess with his audience at every turn.  But rather than having the distance of being able to laugh at the people that Cohen is interacting with on-screen, many of the characters in "The Dictator" turn into straight-men for Aladeen to steam-roll.  Even with comedically-risky segments, what's missing here that was present in Cohen's other starring roles is a sense of danger.  There's no chance of a politician storming off, or of Cohen's character getting shot by a hunter that he's hitting on.  I feel like I would have enjoyed this film a lot more if I hadn't seen anything else that Cohen's done, because this felt like a step backwards.  That's not exactly fair to "The Dictator," but I couldn't put his previous work out of my mind as the bar to judge this film by.

My "three of five" ratings threshold is based on whether or not I'd want to re-watch a movie again.  If not, the film has to be less than three stars.  I enjoyed "The Dictator," but I suspect that once all the shock humor has been ingested, it wouldn't play nearly as well a second time around.  So while this film does feature the greatest on-screen appearance Blake Griffin's ever made, I'd be surprised if I ever sat down to watch "The Dictator" again.

2.5 / 5 - Theatre